US Represented

US Represented

Scientific Puritans Aren’t Helping

Superstitious thinkers have stood in the way of meaningful scientific innovation throughout history, and they still do. They obstruct the serious theoretical and technical challenges we face. Luckily, history also shows that most major scientific discoveries that promised to serve humanity especially well were adopted despite fierce resistance from misguided forces. Most people will do anything to make their lives safer and more comfortable.

Now in a bizarre twist of fate, a horde of materialists have become scientific Puritans. They assume that anything beyond the measurables with which they experiment and the consequent results don’t exist. At the same time, they’re unwilling to admit their limited range of knowledge while arrogantly assuming that their thin information base shouldn’t be challenged. Yet they can account for only 4% of the universe. 96% is dark matter and dark energy, yet they don’t really know what either of those things are. 

This anti-scientific tribe of scientists needs to take a closer look at how dominant cultural influences change and acknowledge that they, too, are participating in a flexible, ever-changing process. Religion was once the most powerful defining force. Then philosophy sprang from religion, gained a foothold in human consciousness, and evolved. Natural science grew out of philosophy and gained prominence. In a subdivision of this, alchemy became chemistry. Astrology became astronomy, metaphysics became physics, demonology became psychology, numerology became mathematics, and so on.

In each case, people were trying to move from subjective to objective models, which is fundamentally good. It was necessary to remove overly subjective thinking in order to make progress through rational means. Unfortunately, abnegating subjectivity altogether limits one’s ability to think imaginatively and can even breed incorrect results due to an unwillingness to examine potentially correct albeit unpopular alternative possibilities. What we see through a telescope or microscope only hints at what is really happening.

Tomorrow’s physics will seem magical to some of our generation’s greatest minds. This is always the case. In fact, people studying 22nd century physics will look back on our physics and wonder how in the world we could, in some cases, have held such primitive, naive notions. Researchers shouldn’t be dwelling on questions like, “Why would anyone think intergalactic travel is possible, much less likely, given our current limitations?” They should be asking, “Why can’t we teleport? How can we harness zero point energy? How can we turn theory into application as soon as possible? What must we do to make this happen? What don’t we understand right now?” Were Giordano Bruno alive today, he would most certainly agree.

Spread the love